seangra wrote: >Why would anyone want to use FAT12 on an SD card that's larger than >16 or 32MB anyway? FAT-12 was great for floppy disks, to save that >few dozen KB on the FAT table because you only had 2MB to work with >in the first place, but anything past 32MB and you get into huge >sector sizes. A 256MB card would have 64KB sector size! Since FAT- >16 is easier to implement, why wouldn't you just stick with that? > > > Legacy, you will find that < 32meg is typically formatted as 12bit. Common sense just doesn't apply to all situations, I guess. :-D TomW -- Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant http://openhardware.net, http://cyberiansoftware.com "Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..." ----------------------------------------------------
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Cheap SD Flash File System
2005-11-10 by Tom Walsh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.