seangra wrote: >>You could clue us in on what specific processor the question is >>about. The UART clock is a bit different in some of the uCs. >> >> > >Sorry, my bad. > >It's LPC2148. > > > >>I am not an expert in this, but I think the higher the multiplier >>(= a lower external crystal freq) the more jitter you get on the >>CCLK. So if you want a very stable CCLK you choose the highest >>supported external crystal frequency you can find. >> >> > > > No, not really. You have to be aware of PPM spec of the crystal. Parts Per Million is a statement of the accuracy of the crystal at a given frequency (Million being Million Cyles or MHz, Parts being the cycles of drift). But higher frequency 5PPM is no more / less accurate than 5PPM at a lower frequency... It does compute into a percentage of error though. >What effect does jitter on the CCLK line have? > >Original question: > > >>Assuming that I want to be able run at maximum speed, what >>oscillator/crystal should I choose? >> >>Normally the choice is dictated by the divider for the UART, >>but in this case (from what I understand) with the prescaler you >>can get just about any baud rate you want from whatever >>source frequency you choose. >> >>So if 10*6 or 20*3 or 15*4 all yield 60MHz, what factors are >>there that influence which frequency should be used? >> >> > > > For me, the primary choice of frequency was that of the bootloader. 14.7456MHz crystal was one of the recommended frequencies and it would give me a 58MHz clockrate for the CPU. I also have some MAX3100 SPI UARTs on my board, they needed a 3.686MHz clock, by using an external TTL oscillator to drive both the X1 input of the processor and drive the input to a divide by 4 counter (74HC93), I was able to satisfy the CPU and the UARTs with one clock source. TomW -- Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant http://openhardware.net, http://cyberiansoftware.com "Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..." ---------------------------------------------------- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Choice of External Frequency
2005-11-11 by Tom Walsh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.