At 09:05 PM 2/19/04 +0000, you wrote: Alaric, >I'm fiddling with some designs for such a thing myself - I can give you >my Eagle files if you want; it would be a shame for our header pinouts >to be unnecessarily incompatible :-) My 0.1" header design brings out >TxD, RxD, 3.3v, 0v, /RST, and P0.14. That would be nice. Please do. I agree on making a consistent header. I was thinking the same set as you on a two row header with 8 pins to allow for keying. That leaves one unused pin (in addition to the keying location). The two rows allows standard ribbon cable and 8 pins is still smaller than most rs232 level convertors. >On the topic of Eagle, where's a good discussion forum for it? I want to >modify the behaviour of the autorouter a bit, but tweaking all the >optimisation costs just seems to make things... worse :-) Have you tried the newsgroups on Cadsoft's site? There is also a file there that provides 'improved' autorouter parameters for 3.5. I haven't heard whether they were used for V4 or not. They are better but they take more passes. I haven't tried them on V4 myself. Robert
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Help me find LPC2000 programmers
2004-02-19 by Robert Adsett
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.