> I believe the uIP project is the one that is actively being > developed. I had planned to look at LwIP first, as I think > thats what was running on the Olimex demo ported by Crossworks. The Crossworks port is of uIP, as is the FreeRTOS port. Paul mentions a 0.9.1 version of uIP on his page: http://www.crossstudio.co.uk/msp430/uip.htm I sent Adam an email requesting it, perhaps I will get a response. > I also have an Altera NIOS II development kit that appears > to have a uCOS-II+LwIP demo. The lwIP implementation in Altera's NIOS II environment is 0.7.2 I believe. Perhaps they updated to 1.1 in the recent 5.0 release? > > Whats your feeling on the two projects ... take a look at the > LwIP examples, by actually do any new work with uIP? My take is that uIP is best suited for a quiet collision domain, or perhaps with hardware assist. Altera had published a very interesting white paper on offloading portions of the IP stack to hardware in the form of DMA peripherals. Working IAR build of uIP/SLIP: 12 312 bytes of CODE memory 4 700 bytes of DATA memory (+ 30 absolute ) 6 464 bytes of CONST memory This might be interesting to compare against a lwIP/SLIP implementation. Joel
Message
RE: [lpc2000] OT: PPP implementation for uIP
2005-12-07 by Joel Winarske
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.