Dear Robert, Referring to the boot loader supplied as monster is SPAM? Really? What I meant to say is that I do not like Philips boot loader because it takes up 8K (too big for what it does) had an inconvenient method for loading programs, so cumbersome that Philips had to provide boot flash loading utility which in itself is too big for what it does. The boot loader also trashes memory at locations I least expected. I prefer my own loader (written in C, under 4K as 32-bit code, smaller as 16-bit code), requires no more than Intel format hex files a simple terminal emulator (Minicom, Hyperterm, etc) for downloading. You need only copy and paste hex records onto the terminal emulator window to download code into RAM (or FLASH) and run it. Jaya --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Robert Adsett <subscriptions@a...> wrote: > > At 11:58 PM 12/19/05 +0000, jayasooriah wrote: > >I stopped when I had all I need to write my own boot loader that > >replaces the monster provided by philips. > > Monster? How so? > > Robert > > " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself. There are always restrictions, be > they legal, genetic, or physical. If you don't believe me, try to chew a > radio signal. " -- Kelvin Throop, III > http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/
Message
{Definitely Spam?} [lpc2000] Re: FLASH Security
2005-12-20 by jayasooriah
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.