Hi Brian, Bill, > That is true, but doesn't help you at all when some anonymous chinese > company clones your new widget. It also doesn't help much if you don't > have 100k budgeted for lawyers to enforce your patents. In countries like that patents aren't even valid anyway. > I have no faith in protection offered by patents or contracts. I need to > keep my code as secure as possible, given the application and > distribution of the device. Same viewpoint here. I think that in the 8 bit arena, the first real level of protection was offered by AVR. Being an ASIC like that, things were scattered around too much, and the charge in a Flash cell is too weak to microprobe it, or so I've been told by Atmel. > That's the bottom line. And the LPC doesn't provide anything that would > prevent someone from cloning the chip using the JTAG interface. You can > cut the pins, but that introduces extra assembly cost, and how hard is > it to scrape off some of the chip's plastic and re-attach to them? Exactly, as per my previous post. > Plans for future code protection in the LPC don't help us now. And they > are likely to be an after-thought when it ought to have been included > from the start. EXACTLY. Some companies here in Oz really have been brought to their knees with that crap. The only protection really I guess is to flood the market fast so there's not much left for parasites, or at least, it wouldn't be worth their while anymore. -- Kris
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Digest Number 94
2004-02-21 by microbit
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.