--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "jayasooriah" <jayasooriah@y...> wrote: > > Robert, what I am doing is exactly that -- sharing experiences. Not > sure why you seem to want to quench the discussion on CRP and security. I guess I am just bored of the month long harangue of Philips. This isn't a discussion, it is a prolonged attack without one shred of proof that Philips is either incorrect or hiding something. I just read through the section in the LPC2292 datasheet (3d paragraph of section 6.2) - it seems pretty clear to me. JTAG doesn't talk to the hardware for programming, it uses IAP which is implemented in the boot code. This from Errata IPA1, 14 NOV 2005. One can suppose that the boot code knows what to do about JTAG access to flash given that the boot code does that actual programming as well as implementing CRP. If Philips says JTAG is disabled if CRP is enabled, where is the proof that they are wrong? Go to the source, get the answers in writing, share the results, if they aren't covered by an NDA. Again, there are formal channels for this. Richard
Message
Re: Flash Security Clarification --- some sad facts
2005-12-26 by rtstofer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.