What basis do you have to think that Atmel chips would be immune to the hacking process as you describe? At 01:52 PM 1/6/2006, you wrote: >Hi, I think you got my points all wrong... > >=> It should be if a company's microcontrollers is more popular >in X country. It will attract more hackers hacking their chips. >(Hee, Atmel microcontroller traditionally is very popular in >China/Taiwan. I do not know how long can the new AT91 CRP last...) > >It is definitely NOT "if chip is HACK-able, it will be more >popular/marketing edge..." :) > >(Hee... I hope you are NOT Atmel re-seller...) >========================================== > >Anyway, those are beside the main topic. >=> Can somebody here please prove the Philips CRP are "HACK-able". >Before we start some discussion whether to switch to..atmel maybe... > >Regards
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Bootloader / CRP summary update
2006-01-06 by Sean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.