Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

RE: [lpc2000] Re: J1939 stacks for the LPC2xxx's?

2006-01-07 by Joel Winarske

> Odd comment. I doubt that they consider their code to be Random. Other
> Microchip implementations have been reliably functional, if not always
> awe inspiring. Their USB, TCP/IP stuff etc is solidly boring. I would
> rather trust this than some $18k package that may very well have been
> brewed up by a hobbyist. just because it's a commercial offering doesn't
> mean it's reliable, I mean look at windows, the PSP, etc etc.

Not odd at all.  It's a hack in light of requiring a J1939 compliant device.
Perhaps more a marketing push to show they have something for the Automotive
sector.  The Microchip CANopen stack is better.

The ~18k package is from CAN-Vector.  http://www.vector-cantech.com/
In the automotive sector they are the leader at what they do.  The majority
of other vendors are integrators who are selling their not-so refined or
tested code base from past projects.


Joel

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.