> Odd comment. I doubt that they consider their code to be Random. Other > Microchip implementations have been reliably functional, if not always > awe inspiring. Their USB, TCP/IP stuff etc is solidly boring. I would > rather trust this than some $18k package that may very well have been > brewed up by a hobbyist. just because it's a commercial offering doesn't > mean it's reliable, I mean look at windows, the PSP, etc etc. Not odd at all. It's a hack in light of requiring a J1939 compliant device. Perhaps more a marketing push to show they have something for the Automotive sector. The Microchip CANopen stack is better. The ~18k package is from CAN-Vector. http://www.vector-cantech.com/ In the automotive sector they are the leader at what they do. The majority of other vendors are integrators who are selling their not-so refined or tested code base from past projects. Joel
Message
RE: [lpc2000] Re: J1939 stacks for the LPC2xxx's?
2006-01-07 by Joel Winarske
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.