At 06:45 PM 1/10/06 -0800, Mike Nelson wrote: >The example given by IAR only does CRC16 (0x11021) >with no complement and MSB first. For any reasonable >span of code, one should really use CRC32, as it is >less likely by far to alias. Well any 16 bit check has approx 256 times fewer aliases than an 8 bit checksum. However a 16 bit CRC and a 16 bit arithmetic checksum have exactly the same number of aliases. The big advantage of the CRC is its sensitivity to burst errors. Whether that is an advantage for flash is, I think, an open question. At least I haven't seen anything that shows the error distribution in flash. And for uploads I could argue either way depending on the character of the changes. Robert " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself. There are always restrictions, be they legal, genetic, or physical. If you don't believe me, try to chew a radio signal. " -- Kelvin Throop, III http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/
Message
Re: [lpc2000] IAR CRC Calculation for EWARM
2006-01-11 by Robert Adsett
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.