Tom, > Well, apparently you went to a different school than I did. Unless you went to Bournemouth School then, yes, I did indeed go to a different school. > Copyright can only be asserted on an original work, simply > reformatting an existing work does not automagically create > a copyright. Hell, I didn't simply reformat any of Philips documents. Constructing an XML description of a part *is* an original work IMO. You don't get anything other than numbers, names, and punctuation in the XML description so it's hardly plagiarism. > Nor does "sweat" justify assigning a copyright. You know what, I didn't claim it did. > Respectfully, it is my opinion that you spend some time looking into copyright practice. I know all about copyright thanks. Given good ties with many silicon manufacturers I'm happy with what our company produces and the copyright we assert, and the same is true with other tool vendors I'm sure. This is an argument I'm not being drawn into. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, AVR and now MAXQ processors
Message
RE: [lpc2000] LPC2103 in IAR EWARM
2006-01-17 by Paul Curtis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.