Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

RE: [lpc2000] Re: LPC2103 in IAR EWARM

2006-01-17 by Paul Curtis

Tom, 

> By Paul's reasoning, if you took the source to an application 
> and handed it to someone to retype, then you "own" the copyright
> to that work!  

You know, I didn't say that.  The context is clear, generating an XML
description of a part from a piece of paper or electronic equivalent.  I
did not say "transcribe".  I have not "trascribed".  I didn't say "by
extension" that allws you to infer anything.  You are certainly twisting
things.

> That is what I'm saying.  So, taking a PDF, XML, or marking on mud 
> tablets, rewriting it in your own style does not make that an 
> original work.  It is merely transcription.

> I admit, this is a very sore point with me.  People who claim 
> copyright over trivial, or commonly known algorithms are doing
> everyone a dis-service.

You cannot copyright an algorithm, that is clear.  However, this is not
the context of my assertion.

--
Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd  http://www.rowley.co.uk
CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, AVR and now MAXQ processors

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.