Tom, > By Paul's reasoning, if you took the source to an application > and handed it to someone to retype, then you "own" the copyright > to that work! You know, I didn't say that. The context is clear, generating an XML description of a part from a piece of paper or electronic equivalent. I did not say "transcribe". I have not "trascribed". I didn't say "by extension" that allws you to infer anything. You are certainly twisting things. > That is what I'm saying. So, taking a PDF, XML, or marking on mud > tablets, rewriting it in your own style does not make that an > original work. It is merely transcription. > I admit, this is a very sore point with me. People who claim > copyright over trivial, or commonly known algorithms are doing > everyone a dis-service. You cannot copyright an algorithm, that is clear. However, this is not the context of my assertion. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, AVR and now MAXQ processors
Message
RE: [lpc2000] Re: LPC2103 in IAR EWARM
2006-01-17 by Paul Curtis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.