Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: LCD display with UC1601 experience

2006-02-02 by Boris Kralik

OK Tom.
US = (us)micro second:sorry for my key mistake :-) .
Manual BTHQ12806, page 11 says in units ns (nano seconds), maximal
'tCY80' value is 135 ns and more. Maximal timing vlaue is not
exsistent. My time is in u(mikro)s, higher value; clk(CLK) and
clka(SDA) too. I check my values, it is in 'us' and 'tahs8' (time to
change CS) was higher as 40ns(manual says), my value is in 'us',
frequency SCK is lower as manual says.
Next (tomorrow, I am at home :-)) I check pinout ones more time, but
I=130mA is more (I think).
Direction:current value is good ?
Thanks for you seats.

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Tom Walsh <tom@...> wrote:
>
> Boris Králik wrote:
> 
> >Hi Marko.
> >I check pinout one more time, pinout is good (I think:
> >Vdd=3V, Vlcd=5V(with capacitors), CS0=pullup to H,
> >PS1=pullup to H, CD to uProc,  PS0 to
> >GND;D1,3,4,5,6,7,RD/WR=GND; Vlcd -> Cap 1uF, and other
> >pins (VB0+,-; VB1+,-) about LCD with capacitors 1uF)).
> >I change Vlcd, first was 3V (same as Vdd) and I
> >changed to 5V. Power consumation increase from cca.
> >30mA to 110mA. I think, this is good, manual says
> >2x60mA. Timing I check on scope, minimal timming at UC
> >is in nano seconds, I work with micro sec.
> >  
> >
> 
> Not sure what you meant by "minimal timing is UC is in nano seconds, I 
> work with micro seconds".  You cannot run an LCD at a frequency 
> significantly higher or lower than what is called for in the data 
> sheet.  The timing is fairly strict.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> TomW
> 
> -- 
> Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant
> http://openhardware.net, http://cyberiansoftware.com
> "Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..."
> ----------------------------------------------------
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.