Hello Jaya, On Monday 06 February 2006 02:13, Jayasooriah wrote: > Hi Tom, > > If we accept what you say, it appears trading one instruction cycle off the > window of opportunity for exception handling is a silly thing to do. > > The designers made a deliberate tradeoff. I am asking why. Does this > action dismiss the threat or does it just reduce the window of opportunity? > > One can only draw inferences from Philips silence that the latter is the > case. Sure - my bet is that they had a nice weekend, and didn't bother checking that forum. > > Kind regards, > > Jaya > > PS1: I am curious as to where it is stated that JTAG cannot run above the > rate the CPU is running at. http://www.arm.com/support/faqip/3732.html The LPCs are ARM7TDMI-S cores, requiring the synchronization logic shown in the above faq entry. That means they can't run TCK above 1/6th of the core frequency. > > PS2: In counting instruction cycles, you have to take into account > pipeline delays. Regards, Dominic
Message
Re: [lpc2000] re: CRP exploits using JTAG
2006-02-06 by Dominic Rath
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.