Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: lpc2100_fan's objection to CRP thread

2006-02-10 by lpc2100_fan

Your suspicious G and T commands got an answer in messages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/message/12267 and
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/message/12234,

you complain Philips doesn't answer, once they answer you ignore it or
doubt it.

I give them the benefit of a doubt, you obviously think you are the
only one here in the forum the REALLY understands what's going on. Not
so! Far from it. I have been working with the LPCs for more than 2
years and there were ups and downs and we were satisfied with the CRP
and still are. The only thing you are achieving that others who
believe in an academic approach not sustained with results that prove
it, get a little paranoid too. 

Commands that are outdated but not removed from programs might not be
the nicest programming style but they are no trojans. A trojans is a
part of a program that enables a backdoor to information. Show us with
all the time you obviously have to spend on this subject that you can
diassemble a one instruction program that is secured and then come
back and talk about it.

Well, as some other were speaking up against your longterm siege of
the forum, I had to let them know there are more that think as they do. 

The posts are a little emotional because we have been quiet and
watching and quiet and watching for almost 8 weeks.

RIP


--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Jayasooriah <jayasooriah@...> wrote:
>
> While lpc2100_fan spoke like any fan would, I must correct a flaw in
the 
> core premise based on which lpc2000_fan objects to CRP thread:
> 
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "lpc2100_fan" <lpc2100_fan@> wrote:
>  > ... so far we got
>  > a memory dump of a LPC2104 bootloader, which be no means has any
>  > security options according to Philips.
>  > This is about as irrelevant as it can be within the LPC2000 family
>  > because ALL other members do have a security option.
> 
> Check the favourite LPC device with CRP security for Trojans at the ISP 
> level itself and experience it for yourself.
> 
> If there is any particular part that does not have these Trojans in
them, 
> please post part number and code versions so that those relying on
CRP can 
> be properly advised as to which part/versions they should be weary of 
> rather than the entire family.
> 
> In my LPC2292 (which has CRP feature) revision 1.64:
> 
> 1/  "G tEsT A" crashes the boot loader.
> 
> 2/  "T" command does interesting things (Philips does not want you
to know 
> about).
> 
> Is this not sufficient proof that what I found in 2105 applies to other 
> part(s) with CRP as well.
> 
> Either someone is feeding my clients fake (or rigged) parts, or
lpc2000_fan 
> got facts wrong.
> 
> Jaya
> 
> Send instant messages to your online friends
http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.