Your suspicious G and T commands got an answer in messages http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/message/12267 and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/message/12234, you complain Philips doesn't answer, once they answer you ignore it or doubt it. I give them the benefit of a doubt, you obviously think you are the only one here in the forum the REALLY understands what's going on. Not so! Far from it. I have been working with the LPCs for more than 2 years and there were ups and downs and we were satisfied with the CRP and still are. The only thing you are achieving that others who believe in an academic approach not sustained with results that prove it, get a little paranoid too. Commands that are outdated but not removed from programs might not be the nicest programming style but they are no trojans. A trojans is a part of a program that enables a backdoor to information. Show us with all the time you obviously have to spend on this subject that you can diassemble a one instruction program that is secured and then come back and talk about it. Well, as some other were speaking up against your longterm siege of the forum, I had to let them know there are more that think as they do. The posts are a little emotional because we have been quiet and watching and quiet and watching for almost 8 weeks. RIP --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Jayasooriah <jayasooriah@...> wrote: > > While lpc2100_fan spoke like any fan would, I must correct a flaw in the > core premise based on which lpc2000_fan objects to CRP thread: > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "lpc2100_fan" <lpc2100_fan@> wrote: > > ... so far we got > > a memory dump of a LPC2104 bootloader, which be no means has any > > security options according to Philips. > > This is about as irrelevant as it can be within the LPC2000 family > > because ALL other members do have a security option. > > Check the favourite LPC device with CRP security for Trojans at the ISP > level itself and experience it for yourself. > > If there is any particular part that does not have these Trojans in them, > please post part number and code versions so that those relying on CRP can > be properly advised as to which part/versions they should be weary of > rather than the entire family. > > In my LPC2292 (which has CRP feature) revision 1.64: > > 1/ "G tEsT A" crashes the boot loader. > > 2/ "T" command does interesting things (Philips does not want you to know > about). > > Is this not sufficient proof that what I found in 2105 applies to other > part(s) with CRP as well. > > Either someone is feeding my clients fake (or rigged) parts, or lpc2000_fan > got facts wrong. > > Jaya > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com >
Message
Re: lpc2100_fan's objection to CRP thread
2006-02-10 by lpc2100_fan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.