Jaya, > I am not if your line of questions will lead to something > useful, but let > me try to explain why what I said is relevant to the very > real problems > people are facing with boot loader. > > >Message: 25 > > Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:11:12 -0000 > > From: "Paul Curtis" <plc@rowley.co.uk> > >Subject: RE: Re: trashed 2148 bootloader > > > > > I can think of AT29x1024 and AM29x800 variants off the cuff. > > > >To my knowledge, those devices do not have an ARM7 in them. > You have, > >therefore, not answered the question I posed. > > I just checked, KEIL tools include these processor in "ARM" category. These are not processors! These are flash devices! I askes about ARMs with *integrated flash*. The LPC2000 is no different to the SAM7 to the ADuC70x0 to the STR7 and so on. None of these ARM processors protect their flash registers from inadvertent access. Same for many other architectures with integrated flash--like the MSP430, which I am very familiar with. Again, you are misunderstanding my question, deliberately or accidentally. This is, I think, the central issue in many of these discussions. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, AVR and now MAXQ processors
Message
RE: [lpc2000] Re: trashed 2148 bootloader
2006-02-22 by Paul Curtis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.