Lpc2000

Jayasooriah wrote:
> I can think of AT29x1024 and AM29x800 variants off the cuff.

(Paul beat me to this reply)

AT29x1024 is a AT-29C1024 Flash memory chip.
AM29x800 is a 29F800 1M Flash memory as well.

These indeed have feed sequences but they are memory chips, not ARM CPUs.
You quote these off the cuff (as your Ace up the sleeve) in reply to a 
challenge, something smells fishy here.....

I have been monitoring this thread for hard factual information but all 
I've been hearing is lots of static. On top of that you are making 
misleading statements.

Please tell us if this is for real. Are they your own findings? Maybe 
you are gleaning off a student perhaps?, and that is why you are not 
able to give us any concrete evidence. ***Take this as a friendly taunt, 
one that you should be able to refute in a microsecond if you are 
genuine. We just want to know facts, not enter into a slinging match, 
otherwise just end this thread here and now.

Some of your information sort of sounds good, I like the idea of having 
a bootloader that doesn't include Flash programming code for the reasons 
you mentioned. Yet I use the IAP Flash programming calls from my 
application anyway, so leaving it out of the bootloader is of no benefit 
to me. Plus I have never had any problems with the Flash anyway though I 
do indeed believe students could trash anything without even trying.

Please, if you reply, just give us your hard conclusive findings and we 
can get back to a more professional level of discussion. If not, you 
should setup a new flame.philips.lpc21xx group where you can become the 
sole moderator/member. This is not a game of poker, you/we do not have 
to wait for Philips to show their hand, just show yours so WE can see 
what you've got.

FACTS Jaya!

I have just noted that Steve is tired of all the static too.

Regards,
*Peter*