Paul, The AT91SAM7A3 very different to LPC I am afraid: 1/ The AT91SAM7A3 has memory protection while LPC has none. 2/ Flash programming is protected in AT91SAM7A3 manual while it is not in LPC: >All the commands are protected by the same keyword, which has to be >written in the eight highest bits of the MC_FCR register. Writing MC_FCR >with data that does not contain the correct key and/or with an invalid >command has no effect on the memory plane... I have not bothered checking up on your other references ... and I ask that you do your homework first before making ambit claims. I have done mine. Regards, Jaya >--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Curtis" <plc@...> wrote: > > The LPC2000 is no different to the SAM7 to the > > ADuC70x0 to the STR7 and so on. None of these ARM processors protect > > their flash registers from inadvertent access. Same for many other > > architectures with integrated flash--like the MSP430, which I am very > > familiar with. > > > > Again, you are misunderstanding my question, deliberately or > > accidentally. This is, I think, the central issue in many of these > > discussions. > > > > -- > > Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk > > CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, AVR and now MAXQ processors > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
Message
Re: trashed 2148 bootloader
2006-02-23 by Jayasooriah
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.