> > I have looked at the code before and after boot loader update to address > this problem. I formed my opinion on the significance of this mode of > failure after considering the update, and based on looking at parts that > failed. > > Perhaps you should do something similar before you refute my observations > with substance. > Jaya, Can you indicate how this IAP problem effects the boot loader? I'm not refuting what you say: all I'm asking for is some evidence to your claim "the boot loader is broken". In very simple terms, can you describe a set of actions that shows that the boot loader is broken (i.e. doesn't function as expected)? That is, have you observed the boot loader fail, and leave a part in an unrecoverable state? If so, what actions led to this happenening? All I've heard to date is a lot of noise and opinion on things that may or may not be relevant to the original claim. As I've pointed out, this is only generating heat rather than light. Can you shine some light, please? Thanks! Brendan
Message
Re: trashing 2148 bootloader
2006-02-23 by brendanmurphy37
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.