Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: trashing 2148 bootloader

2006-02-23 by brendanmurphy37

> 
> I have looked at the code before and after boot loader update to 
address 
> this problem. I formed my opinion on the significance of this mode 
of 
> failure after considering the update, and based on looking at 
parts that 
> failed.
> 
> Perhaps you should do something similar before you refute my 
observations 
> with substance.
> 

Jaya,

Can you indicate how this IAP problem effects the boot loader? 

I'm not refuting what you say: all I'm asking for is some evidence 
to your claim "the boot loader is broken".

In very simple terms, can you describe a set of actions that shows 
that the boot loader is broken (i.e. doesn't function as expected)? 
That is, have you observed the boot loader fail, and leave a part in 
an unrecoverable state? If so, what actions led to this happenening?

All I've heard to date is a lot of noise and opinion on things that 
may or may not be relevant to the original claim. As I've pointed 
out, this is only generating heat rather than light. Can you shine 
some light, please?

Thanks!

Brendan

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.