Lpc2000

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Jayasooriah <jayasooriah@...> wrote:
>
> I am glad you finally understood what CSI bug is after I reported 
another 
> such bug months ago.

Jaya, like a lot of people, I don't have the time to monitor the 
forum continuously: only when there's some live topic that's of 
interest or relevance to me. Maybe it would help if when you make a 
claim (that, if true, would have a significant negative impact on 
others) you can supply the evidence with the claim? If your claim 
relied on behaviour you'd previously reported, why not just refer 
people to it? It's taken the best part of a week to establish the 
basis for your statement "the bootloader is broken".  Once people 
have the evidence, they can make up their own mind. In my case, based 
on what I've heard, I'm happy to proceed with using the boot loader 
as it is. If you or others disagree with this, that's fine. I've no 
interest in debating the issue, just in establishing the basis for 
the original claim.

> You would have realised I did this if only you spent less time 
attacking 
> the messenger and put more effort in digesting the message.

I'd hardly call asking for evidence for a claim as attacking the 
messenger!

> I do not wish to start another flame war.  It is best you consult 
your a 
> lawyer if you need a particular wording or interpretation confirmed 
or denied.

No need for lawyers: the only reason I felt the need to keep re-
phrasing the question because it wasn't being answered: I'd assumed 
there was some misunderstanding, or I wasn't making myself clear.

> 
> I have put on this forum as much as I am prepared to.  Time to move 
on.

I couldn't agree more!

Brendan