Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

RE: Re[4]: [lpc2000] Re: Bit addressing

2006-03-01 by Robert Adsett

Quoting Paul Curtis <plc@...>:

> Hi,
>
>> There was an initiative to standardize a set of macros and library
>> routines for ISO C for Hardware access.  I havn't heard of it in a
>> while though.
>
> There is a TR for Embedded C.  It has an unweildy set of crappy macros.
> No wonder users have never heard of it, compiler vendors probably don't
> want anything to do with it.  More odeous even than C99.

That's probably what I was remembering.

>>   - Bitfield write is necessarily an RMW sequence which is
>> invalid for a lot of hardware and non-atomic on a lot of
>> processors.
>
> Actually, some ARM processors are now becoming available with bit-level
> I/O to ports.  I'm thinking here of the MAC7100 series and another
> that's coming up soon.  Writing a one or a zero to a single bit in an
> I/O port simply becomes a 32-bit write to the bit-addressed register,
> and reading that register returns a 0/1 based on the bit in the port.
> You can write all 32 bits at a time too, if you need to.

So that would be a register per bit?  32 registers to deal with a full 
32bit I/O
port (plus presumably another register for full access)?

Robert

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.