Lpc2000

From someone who does not know the difference between "break" and "brake", 
I must say you have considerable talent in prefacing you misguided claims 
and false statements with insults and abuses.

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "John Heenan" <l10@...> wrote:
 >
 > I feel like I am being expected to answer to prima donnas who are
 > affronted at the suggestion their beautiful abstract creations might
 > be sullied by dirty greasy real things under the bonnet, that it is
 > beneath their dignity to be expected to have knowledge of. You can
 > just feel the 'hurt', after all I am now expected to explain the
 > obvious.
 >
 > What is very clear is that there is an appalling lack of good sound
 > electronic and architectural knowledge from participants in the
 > group. If there was sound knowledge then these guys (Jaya and
 > Dominic) would never have got away with theie pseudo discussions,
 > wrapped up in pseudo educated 'consultancy speak'.
 >
 > There is a clear need for a document that explains the very basics. I
 > wish I had time to do this. I don't. It is not my job. It is not the
 > job of Philips, their job is to sell excellent prodcuts. It is the
 > job of educators or researchers, in fact those who are doing the very
 > undermining.
 >
 > JTAG and debug are NOT the same. For those who are educated the
 > meaning of the word debug is made clear by the context. In the
 > context of CRP, debug clearly means enabling the debug bus signal to
 > act, which JTAG, if enabled, may be attempting to assert. Lack of
 > real educated insight is giving rise to confusion that should not
 > exist and I should not be expected to clarify, particularly to those
 > who claim or imply expertise. Clearly debug can also mean JTAG, but
 > in a different context.
 >
 > John Heenan

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com