I come from the other side of the problem. All of my background is in hardware design. I struggle with things like Linux and the GNU toolchain but datasheets and timing specs are a cake walk. But, we're all having fun or we wouldn't be here! Richard --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Tom Walsh <tom@...> wrote: > > Sutton Mehaffey wrote: > > >Thanks Richard. > > > >I think I discovered 99% of the problem. Apparently, I was shipped > >samples of the Serial RAM FM24C256 chip that were true 5V parts and I > >asked for 3.3V. Makes it a little difficult to get the chip to work > >:) But, I will also change my pullups when I get the correct chip in. > > They are too high. > > > >I've been a software designer for many years and I am trying to learn > >more about the hardware side and do some of the design myself. I > >found I don't learn how the hardware works as well if I have someone > >else do all the hardware design. So, sometimes I miss some things in > >the datasheet that are very important (4.7K pullups instead of 10K). > >It's fun to learn, though. > > > > > > > > That's how we all did it, you can learn all you want in schools, but > until you get into the real world ... > > I've learned a lot by looking at other's designs, heh, I do not "know it > all" and it is is fun to learn new stuff! > > Enjoy, > > TomW > > >Sutton > > > > > > > >--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "rtstofer" <rstofer@> wrote: > > > > > >>--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Sutton Mehaffey" <sutton@> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Charles, > >>> > >>>Using 10K pullups. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>10k isn't a pull-up when applied to I2C. The absolute maximum that > >>might work on a good day is about 4.7k and a more realistic value is > >> > >> > >2.2k. > > > > > >>You never provided a link to the RAM device (that I recall) but in > >>looking at the FM24CL64, they recommend a 1.1k pull-up. The reason it > >>is so small is the lower VDD. Normally, at 5V VDD the pull-up can go > >>as low as 2k, maybe 1.8k. At 3.3V the resistor would be somewhat > >> > >> > >smaller. > > > > > >>But, again, I don't know which device you are using. > >> > >>Richard > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant > http://openhardware.net, http://cyberiansoftware.com > "Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..." > ---------------------------------------------------- >
Message
Re: I2C
2006-03-11 by rtstofer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.