Alexey Bishletov schrieb: > If someone use CPRS to disable and enable interrupts instead of using > VICIntEnClr, will he have problems with spurious interrupts discussed > in AN? The problem comes up if the reason for the interrupt is gone away before the VIC could ack it. This happens mainly because the interrupt was disabled in the peripheral. Changing CPSR could not provocate such. But having a default interrupt handler installed is good practice (or defensive programming) anyway. (Same as initializing _all_ peripherals, not only those used.) -- 42Bastian
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: spurious interrupts on LPC
2006-03-15 by 42Bastian Schick