to Q1: in my opinion 5V tolerant means 5V tolerant within the full spec. But I am not Philips insider, so I don't know any life time lack with this assumption. I use it that way... to Q2: it seems to me ok with the restriction that you won't have the full speed of the output because the RC of the pullup and the C of the load. It stays in any case faster then a ULN2003! And obviously you software port modell shoud be set on open-drain. to Q3: I sugest you to reduce from 5V to 3.3V with a simple resistor attenuator. I prefer this solution because also in case of transients, the ADC voltage newer get any peaks higher then 3.3V. Overvoltages may produce crosstalk between ADCs. A second positiv effect is that a R load to a sensor amplifier forces the opamp to work in class A. I experienced better response with small signals. to Q4: sorry, no idea Kurt >From: "dijucthat" <bigdaddy81@...> >Reply-To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com >To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [lpc2000] 5v system integration >Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:06:14 -0000 > >I have a project that was setup for a 5v AVR that I would like to >convert to an LPC2294. > >Q1: Is it better to use a simple voltage divider on the GPIO Input (to >get 3.3v) or should I leave it at 5v? (I know it says 5v "tolerant", >but is it safer at 3.3v) > >Q2: On GPIO outputs, can I use a pullup to get 5v, or should I use a >buffer, ULN2003, etc.? (again, I am concerned with reliability) > >Q3: On the sensors designed for 5v operation, is an op-amp with gain ><1 the best solution to achieve 0-3.3 scale? > >Q4: On the ADC inputs, I have read that you should ues pullups even if >they are not in use.... does this apply to all LPC? > >Thank you very much for any response! > Daniel. > > >
Message
RE: [lpc2000] 5v system integration
2006-03-15 by Kurt Heinz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.