Lpc2000

Jaya,

I've no interest in politics, nor in proving or disproving what you 
say. 

The point I was making (repeatedly!) is that your "solution" for UART 
related spurious interrupts is in fact no solution, as it simply says 
don't use the relevant interrupt. This isn't very practical.

I've also asked you (again, repeatedly) for information on why you 
claim having an empty default interrupt handler won't work. I'm very 
interested in this, as it's currently in use; if it's likely to fail, 
I'd like to know about it.

Having said that, I would imagine most people are extremely tired of 
this topic at this stage, so if you don't want to answer, I'm sure no 
one will mind. I'm certainly happy enough to stop right now.

Keep up the good work.

Brendan

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Jayasooriah <jayasooriah@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Brendan,
> 
> You are repeating yourself.
> 
> I have seen your original post.  I do not feel like dwelling in 
politics.
> 
> I have made a technical report about spurious interrupts on LPC 
family 
> based on experiments I conducted on LPC2292.  The code is available 
for 
> anyone who wishes to verify my experiments.
> 
> If you thin there is an error in the report please be kind enough 
to point 
> this out specifically and I will try explain it better in the 
report itself 
> for the benefit of all.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Jaya
> 
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "brendanmurphy37" <brendan.murphy@> 
wrote:
>  >
>  >
>  > Jaya,
>  >
>  > Rather than repeat myself (again!), please see:
>  >
>  > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/message/14402
>  >
>  > Regards
>  > Brendan
> 
> Send instant messages to your online friends 
http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>