> I was just typing response when Richard replied. My point was stack > consumption was the biggest difference. Although I was under the > incorrect > assumption you were solely looking at Contiki for an IP stack. Given > Richards input on co-routine support, I would take a closer look at > FreeRTOS. There's even an uIP port, so you're nearly halfway there. > One other point, you can achieve cleaner event driven code using an RTOS. Some RTOS's leave FIQ untouched for user independent code, so it can be used to drop the absolute RTOS priority. Joel
Message
RE: [lpc2000] Re: contiiki for LPC
2006-03-29 by Joel Winarske