Joel Winarske wrote: > Hi Ake, > > I was just typing response when Richard replied. My point was stack > consumption was the biggest difference. Although I was under the incorrect > assumption you were solely looking at Contiki for an IP stack. Given > Richards input on co-routine support, I would take a closer look at > FreeRTOS. There's even an uIP port, so you're nearly halfway there. > > Richard: > Can you mix co-routines and tasks? > Can you assign co-routines to a specific stack, say have two stacks, both > hosting a different set of co-routines? > > > Joel You are not making this a lot easier for me guys? ;-) /Ake -- --- Ake Hedman (YAP - Yet Another Programmer) eurosource, Brattbergavagen 17, 820 50 LOS, Sweden Phone: (46) 657 413430 Cellular: (46) 73 0533 146 Company home: http://www.eurosource.se Kryddor/Te/Kaffe: http://www.brattberg.com Personal homepage: http://www.eurosource.se/akhe Automated home: http://www.vscp.org
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: contiiki for LPC
2006-03-29 by Ake Hedman, eurosource
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.