I would consider using keil uVision in cooperation with ADS(arm develper studio) compiler/linker. /Pero --- Monday, March 15, 2004, 6:20:22 PM, si napisal: > Hi, > there have been many ports to support the LPC2000 family already. > Ashling, Hitech, IAR, Keil, Rowley just to name some of them (in > alphabetical order). Also the ARM RealView and GHS support the family. > In my personal opinion, the most important consideration is what you > used so far rather than the difference in features. If you are a > migrating 51-customer and you used IAR or Keil and you were satisfied, > the logical choice is to stay with them. Same is true if you are > migrating from PIC and used Hitech or from MSP430 / AVR and used IAR, > stay with them if you like the IDE. Another consideration is what kind > of debugger / emulator you want to use. If Ashling is your first > choice, you might also want to use their compiler port (single source > supply). If Nohau is your favorite, they work closely with Hitech and > IAR. If Hitex is your favorite, the closest partner is Keil. If you > use a standard wiggler, Rowley seems to work very reliably. > The long story short, there are too many combinations to recommend an > IDE that suits everyone. > Some statements have already been made: > Rowley works nicely with Olimex tools > Keil has the best simulator (helpful for more than 1 breakpoint in > flash memory) > In general dedicated compiler such as GHS, ARM, IAR and the new kid on > the block Hitech have a little better code-density than a GNU-based > compiler. Whether that is important for you, you decide. > Summary: there are a lot of mature tools on the market and you might > want to get an evaluation version, compile some code and compare the > results based on your own code. You will also see the difference in > look and feel between the tools you will evaluate. A lot of the like / > dislike is personal taste. > Hope I did not offend any of our tool partners while still providing > some useful information ;-) > Regards, Robert > Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-15 by Peter Kuhar
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.