I agree. Look at uIP, it took me less than a sunday afternoon to port it to an eZ80 board with a CS8900 controller. And I didn't have the driver for CS8900. My experience was very good with uIP 0.6; meanwhile 0.9 was released and it fixed some bugs that I have to fix myself in the 0.6 version (yes, this also happened in the same afternoon). So give it a try, I don't think you'll regret it. embeddedjanitor <charles.manning@...> wrote: --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "r_stickley" <r_stickley@y...> wrote: > Wondering if anyone has any recommendations for a good TCP/IP stack. > I just assumed that if we switched to an ARM processor, there would be > lots of stacks available, but I'm not finding many. > > Several I've looked at are in the $10K range (very nicely done I'm > sure, but too expensive for a small project). Several embedded stack > companies are now out of business also... > > Main requirements are to support as many TCP levels as possible, in a > minimal amount of RAM...for something under $1K. > > Thanks in advance! Generally I'd say that TCP/IP stacks would be written mainly in C and thus CPU neutral. Have a grub around various LGPL and similar offerings. With LPC21xx, your biggest worry is probably going to be keeping the RAM footprint small. Look at http://dunkels. com/adam/uip/size.html which has been crafted for small size. -- Charles Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Looking for TCP/IP stack
2004-03-16 by Bogdan Marinescu
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.