> > Looks like a good assembler, but he doesn't support the standard ARM > syntax, either :-( > I'm really a bit naive here, no doubt, but couldn't one make the preprocessor run on a .S file (probably it already does)? Then we could macro in the differences, unless operands are reordered (or something similarly ugly), but I'd think it's a pretty one-one correspondence, no? Of course, someone still has to do the work; the rest of us just 'borrow' assembly files for startup code and interrupt handlers that were written with gas already ;) Steve
Message
Re: assembler arm vs. gas
2006-04-03 by Steve Franks