Thanks Jaya for your clear response. This is what I thought. I will search for other topics since everybody advised me... --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "jayasooriah" <jayasooriah@...> wrote: > > Hello, > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "croquettegnu" <croquettegnu@> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to know what are the limitations of the CRP protection > > because this kind of protection is controlled by the onchip bootloader > > so by software and I think that it is perhaps less efficient than a > > hardware code read protection feature ... > > Not only less efficient but also not as safe. > > > In fact, what are the solutions to access the flash code content even > > if CRP is enabled ? > > I understand there are. > > No one has posted one in this forum. > > Posting such a solution would IMHO be breaking relevant laws in many > countries relating to disclosure of security circumventing measures. > > > I have seen that ATMEL proposes a flash security bit which disables > > the JTAG and prevents from flash access. This protection can not be > > suppressed except by erasing the flash which is more secure to my mind > > .. Am I worng ? > > I do not know which variant you are referring to, but in general you > have to look for evidence that indicates that security is supported at > the hardware level. > > A software afterthought (as I characterises the LPC CRP feature) in > general only stops novices and gives a false sense of security IMO. > > Example of hardware support in Mega32: "The Chip Erase will erase the > Flash and EEPROM memories plus Lock bits. The Lock bits are not reset > until the program memory has been completely erased."] > > > Thanks in advance > > You need to be aware that boot loader of LPC family mitigates (i.e. > tries to reduce the impact of) but not remove the window of > opportunity that exists between chip reset and when the boot loader > actually disables JTAG port. > > You can read the original threads (complete with insults, emotions and > all). I thought this summary would be useful. > > Jaya >
Message
Re: Code Read Protection Feature : Flash Security issue ?
2006-04-04 by croquettegnu
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.