Lpc2000

At 01:35 PM 4/25/06 +1000, Peter Homann wrote:
>And why would the person who has managed to break it tell the world?
>Danish Ali wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > IMHO the LPC2xxx* should be regarded as safe until someone
> > claims to have _broken_ copy protection, not just come up with
> > a theoretical line of attack.

As a warning to users who rely on it (to some extent or other).  And to 
ensure it gets fixed.  The world is full of examples of security holes that 
get glossed over until someone shows that they can be used.

Any yes, there are people who do publish with that intent.

Robert

" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,   be 
they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to chew a 
radio signal. "  -- Kelvin Throop, III
http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/