Earlier I said ... --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "jayasooriah" <jayasooriah@...> wrote: > > The LPC does the first as well, The second it does differently. > Better as > > far as I'm concerned. However both are reasonably easily dealt > with. Only > > when running close to the edge would that be a deciding factor in > choosing > > one over the other. > > The approach you refer to as "better" is IMO flawed ... Apologies if I misunderstood as to which method you said as better. In addition reasons I gave, I forgot to mention one obvious drawback. If you have a requirement that you must recover from watchdog reset without the outside world knowing about this, then the LPC approach fails where the second method works.
Message
Re: re : LPC hardware+software problems (was: UART0 interrupts without FIFOs)
2006-04-30 by jayasooriah