Brendan, SAM7: > Single Cycle Access at Up to 30 MHz in Worst Case Conditions LPC2: I believe Philips has said its flash runs at 20MHz (or 25MHz I cannot remember). This why I said LPC flash is no faster than SAM. As for OKI, I have seen this in comparison charts, but I do not know the basis on which they have made such a claim. I am not "making claims" Brendan, just sharing information I have seen in a conversation mode. Jaya --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "brendanmurphy37" <brendanmurphy37@...> wrote: > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "jayasooriah" <jayasooriah@> > wrote: > > As for flash speed, I understand LPC is not as fast as SAM and > maybe > > even OKI. > > I think anyone making a claim like this should provide some evidence > to back it up. > > We've done extensive, comparative benchmarks of the LPC2xxx against > OKI and other 32-bit MCUs. > > Given that benchmarks can be used to prove anything, I'd suggest > anyone seriously concerned about performance do their own benchmarks > of what they're actually doing. > > Similarly, anyone making a claim such as the one above should > provide benchmarks to back it up: otherwise there's no credibility > to the claim. > > Brendan >
Message
Re: LPC hardware+software problems
2006-05-01 by jayasooriah
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.