Lpc2000

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, <sig5534@...> wrote:

> I don't think that is the whole story.  The 400mSec for the LPC is
due to a
> voltage convertor starting up inside the chip, as I recall.  It is not a
> function of flash memory speed.

I think so too and the two registers that control this converter are
labelled as LPC[10] and LPC[11] in my boot loader page.

Whether it is flash or converter this is no consolation to a user.  I
know of one instance when the client thought Philips EEPROM example
was a good idea until they discovered interrupts they could not afford
to leave interrupts off for almost half a second.

You get what you pay for applies here and so long as it meets your
needs, there is no reason not be happy with it.

Jaya