Lpc2000

jayasooriah schrieb:
> Oppps... I should have seen the binary code -- you *are* generating
> 32-bit code.
> 
> In this case, I think the compiler decided not to use literal pools
> for some reason.  May be there is no place nearby to place the pool
> constants.
> 
> So I really have no idea what it is trying to optimise, if this is
> what it is doing!

An ldr rn,[pc,#n] (which is the real opcode behind ldr rn,=<const>)
might have some pipeline stalls longer than the 3 mov instructions.
Would be interessting to see if the compiler make differences
if optimized for size and not for speed ?


-- 
42Bastian