Lpc2000

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "lpc2100_fan" <lpc2100_fan@...> wrote:
>
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "jayasooriah" <jayasooriah@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "brendanmurphy37"
> > <brendanmurphy37@> wrote:
> > 
> > > To be fair to Philips, they generally describe the on-board flash 
> > > as "program memory", and it's clear that this is very much its 
> > > intended purpose.
> > 
> > The two version EE demo that Philips published must be rubbish then.
> >
...
> 
> Calling the detailed information how to store data in the program
> memory "rubbish" seems more than just a little out of place. 
> 
> Bob

You missed my point as to what I was referring to as "rubbish".

It is very clear from the EE demo example, and the statements made by
Philips that it is selling its on-chip flash as a viable alternative
to EEPROM.

*If* the claim that Philips describes on-chip flash as "program
memory" and not as a viable alternative to EEPROM is true, *then* the
release of not one but two version of EE demo must be rubbish.

Jaya