They're measuring distances of kms, to an acuracy of 6m (still in the 20ns range in terms of time, though). As I said, a tough enough job using a standard micro. I think if you're going to use this technique, you'd need some piece of hardware on the front-end with a fast clock driving it to get the kind of acuracy to make it useful. In which case, the speed of the micro isn't too relevant. There are other better approaches, I'm sure. Brendan --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Leon Heller" <leon.heller@...> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Onestone" <onestone@...> > To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:15 PM > Subject: Re: [lpc2000] Re: Hello all.... > > > >I thought the commercial systems used phase shift to determine distance? > > > > Some measure the time for the pulse to return: > > http://www.acuityresearch.com/products/ar4000/index.shtml > > http://near.jhuapl.edu/fact_sheets/NLR.pdf > > Leon > --- > [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility > to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are > currently using to read this email. ] >
Message
Re: Hello all....
2006-05-16 by brendanmurphy37
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.