Hello again,
I am using the armcc compiler from ARM itself. Also I already tried the static option. Doesn't quite work. Thanks for that.
Difficult to understand the disassembly code comparsion b/n o0 and o3.
Anyways thanks for all your comments. I'll do what I can.
Cheers,
Vineet.
Eric Rullens <gorilla@...> wrote: Vineet,
> I need to use that option for speed. Can't get away with that.
>
> Any other pointers?
It would help if you told what compiler (+version, platform etc.) you are
using. Also you might want to look at the code generated by your compiler to
get a clue about what it is doing... You may want to code that specific
section in assembly if speed really is an issue.
And if you do not find the problem, perhaps post a minimal code sample that
produces the same issue.
Eric
> Eric Rullens <gorilla@...> wrote: > --- In
> lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Tom Walsh <tom@...> wrote:
> > > The boingboing ARM compiler version 198 is broken, don't use -O3
> > >
> > > TomW
> >
> > boingboing?
>
> Yeah, the same goes for the bzzztbzzzt ARM compiler v2.01c....
>
> Eric
SPONSORED LINKS
Microcontrollers Microprocessor Intel microprocessors
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "lpc2000" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
RE: [lpc2000] Re: Global arrays
2006-05-26 by vineet jain
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.