At 10:18 30.05.2006 +0100, you wrote: >Hi, > > > I suppose the next question is when? > >Well, I already have samples, so when is probably very soon. > > > And how much? > >No idea. See at http://www.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Criteria?Ref=50344&Site=US&Cat=33948585 If the link does not work, search for "STR91" on www.digikey.com > > I must admit to shying away from ARM9 as I thought that you > > always got the MMU and that, unfortunately, was going to open > > the doors for the software engineers to go completely > > crazy... It looks like the ARM966E-S dosen't lead you down > > that path but gives you some nice performance improvements. > >Some ARM9s require the MMU to be enabled to get a cache IIRC. This ARM9 >is an ARM9 without the baggage that normally comes with it. Certainly >more real, and I would say more useful, than an LPC3000 for regular >embedded apps. Regards Herbert
Message
RE: [lpc2000] the race is on
2006-05-30 by Herbert Demmel
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.