I've done 2 designs with LPC parts and they were good. I was just designing in another AT91SAM7X256 for a new project, but since I saw the STR912 I am dropping the Atmel and changing the design over to the ST part right now. I need a lot of I/O along with Enet, USB, and built in flash. LPC does not have anything close to that yet. The Atmel part was one of the few choices but I had to add a Altera MAXII CPLD as well to get enough I/O. The STR912 has 80 pins of I/O, Enet, USB, Flash, and ARM9. Much faster than the ARM7 CPUs and now with the STR912 I don't need the CPLD at all. Better performance, lower total cost, and smaller PCB size. Moreover, the STR91X's have 2 separate groups of flash memory. That's very cool. I don't need another EEPROM for parameter storage. You can write to the smaller flash while still excecuting code in the main Flash. Can't do that with the LPCs. I've looked at a lot of the ARM7/9 parts out there and these new ones from ST are very hot. They have a lot of great features, and where most ARM9 parts require separate SRAM and Flash, these have that built in. That saves a ton of pins. If you need a lot of I/O and these other features, right now I think the ST parts are at the top of the list. Chris. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [lpc2000] LPC21xx vs STR91x?? was: the race is on
2006-05-31 by sig5534@hotmail.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.