--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Robert Adsett <subscriptions@...> > I don't care about virtualization or compressing the heap but making sure > only certain processes can write to specific address ranges, now that I'd > like to see. I just haven't seen an implementation on a microcontroller yet. > > Robert > If you're looking for an ARM9 or similar with MMU try the Cirrus Logic EP9302 - see http://tinyurl.com/8v9ar or one of the Intel Xscale parts - see http://tinyurl.com/psbfv Of course, it's debatable wither these are microcontrollers or not, but both have CPU, MMU, (some) memory and a peripheral set on-board. I agree that the primary use of MMU is to support protected mode operating systems: I can't see how it would really help with compressing heaps etc. Although protected mode operating systems used to be associated with "big systems", there's no doubt there's a big move to them for embedded systems. Costs are falling, Linux is available, demand for smarter and more general purpose systems increasing etc. Right now you can go from a $1 Cortex processor to a $10 ARM9/MMU micro with a lot of blurring in between in terms of CPU performance, on-board memory size and mix, MMU support, peripheral mix, pin-count etc. In other words, there's plenty of choice out there, and more every day. Due to the range of parts, cost and track record I'd expect Philips to continue to do well at the low end with the LPC2000. No doubt they're hoping to do as well at the higher end with the LPC3000 series, but I'd say it's still pretty open as to who will be the winner in that space. Just an opinion, of course.... Brendan
Message
Re: the race is on
2006-05-31 by brendanmurphy37
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.