Hi Bob,
> lowest voltage and higest temperature (this is worst
case), it is
> probably not a lot faster than the specification. We decided NOT to
> overclock because we would be on our own in case there is any
> misbehavior of the device and this is my recommendation for everybody
> who wants to develop a serious application with the 21xx.
> probably not a lot faster than the specification. We decided NOT to
> overclock because we would be on our own in case there is any
> misbehavior of the device and this is my recommendation for everybody
> who wants to develop a serious application with the 21xx.
This is a very WISE decision and also sound advice Bob
!
Surely you have been in the position where I have been on many
occasions. :
You run into problems with (officially) "unknown" silicon
problems.
If anything is *slightly" out of characterisation, they JUMP
on the chance for an excuse.
(If all excuses are exhausted, it falls back to the good old
"ESD" damage story, pathetic really)
You can always tell when you submit a concise report
describing the silicon problem.
You suddenly get a stream of *seemingly* off-topic or dumb
questions from the vendor.
That's when you know for sure you've run into a silicon
snag.
Once a US RF silicon vendor had the audacity to even go
to the extent in their dumb cover-up to
suggest that my "problem" was caused by it being summer in
Australia, and that I had to constantly
keep spraying freezer spray on the chip.
Can you believe that ???
Or the good old back-dated Errata sheets !!!!!!!!!!!!! (ie.
> ;2 years :-)
-- Kris