> If you are using >= 3.31, you should not need the > assembly-language interrupt harness (if you are using a > version before this, you will need the harness). I'm going to reply to my own post (and be a little more specific...). When programming in C, I prefer to use ISRs without an assembly-language harness. With 3.3.1 you can - in my (thus far fairly limited) experience with this compiler - get away with this. This was not possible with previous versions of GCC that I have tried. However, this only applies *** with simple ISRs ***. With non-trivial ISRS (including, for example, function calls) we've run into problems. If I understand the GCC bug reports correctly, this bug may be fixed in GCC 3.4, sometime next year? At present, I've gone back to use assembly-language harnesses for all my ISRs. Michael. +======================================+ Michael J. Pont, PhD Embedded Systems Laboratory, University of Leicester http://www.le.ac.uk/eg/embedded +======================================+
Message
Re: Re: [lpc2100] Re: Interrupt works in Keil simulator but not in target
2003-12-10 by Michael Pont