At 03:35 PM 6/9/2004, you wrote: While have not given IAR a full evaluation I tried Crossworks after experiencing stability issues with the first LPC2000/GNU based tools I did consider purchasing. Besides the debugger stability I also found Crossworks Task Scheduling Libraries eliminated need for RTOS for my first couple of (rather simple - just scheduling - no message queues ... ) ARM32 apps. Their response to my tech issues has been good as well. While eval board I'm currently using not on their supported list of demos had little problems in getting it working. Mike >Hi > >I have tried IAR and CrossWorks. Both good compilers, but IAR still >have problems with debugging code in Flash by using JTAG. >Debugging with code downloaded in RAM works. > >Crossworks just works no problems, I think you should concider trying >Crossworks. It may look a little different to IAR when using the IDE, >but very intuitive to use. >I have not tried KEIL, but KEIL compiler is also GNU like Crossworks. > >Best regards >John > > >--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "carlg85001" <carlg85001@y...> wrote: > > I am contemplating using the Phillips LPC21xx series chip in a new > > design and was looking for some feedback on tools. I've had a few >bad > > experiences with the IAR tools on the atmel avr's so I'm a little > > cautious. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: IAR vs. KEIL
2004-06-10 by Michael Mathews
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.