I took a long look at your reply and the message reference on the bug. Honestly I haven't experienced this bug before. Are all lpc2114/19/29 chips affected? > The manual states that you should pass the cclk frequency, and not > Fosc. I would also have thought that the use of the PLL shouldn't > matter as long as you passed the right frequency value, but my > experiments show otherwise. Try disabling the PLL. Yeah, I see it in the manual. It's very wierd that I still got good writes & erases when I passed in frequencies other than cclk with PLL enabled. Sorry to be a thorn though but can someone explain why and/or how PLLs can affect IAP alternate writes & erases? Thanks
Message
Re: IAP successfully used in LPC2119/2129/2194/2292/2294?
2004-07-14 by Leighton Rowe