Pablo Bleyer Kocik wrote:
> At 22:45 2004-07-20, you wrote:
>
>
>>Thanks for that.
>>Would the same 'make' be OK with other GNU packages (MSP430 and
>>Hitachi) ? I always had a problem with a coexistance of GNU tools for
>>different micros.
>>Jan
>
>
> 'GNU make' is 'GNU make', if they are the same version they should behave
> the same. However, if you are using make for a Cygwin environment, you
> should be aware of the directory path translations Cygwin does with the
> filesystem (eg /cygdrive/{drive}, /usr/..., mounts, etc.)
>
> Regards.
>
>
> --
> PabloBleyerKocik /"Why don't we rewrite it all in assembly
> pbleyer2004 / language for processor Mega666?"
> @... / - The linux-kernel mailing list FAQ
>
>
Also, make sure that there are no other Development tools with an own 'make' in
the PATH variable before GNU-make. I ran into that problem when Eclipse instead
of GNU-make found the make utility that came with Borland C++ Builder. That one
didn't work with my makefile and produced an error. If you can't change the
order of entries in the PATH variable (e.g. because then the other tools will
not be able to find their 'make') you could create a symbolic link like
"gnu-make" and tell Eclipse to use that name to call 'make'.
Regards,
JensMessage
Re: [lpc2000] Re: TiniARM Development with Eclipse
2004-07-21 by Jens Hildebrandt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.