Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: Flash Security

2004-09-16 by funes_armando

Thanks for your answer.

Do you know if Philips is planning to add this feature to the 
LPC210x?.

Is it possible to disable JTAG debugger by firmware?

Regards

Armando




--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "philips_apps" <philips_apps@y...> 
wrote:
> Hello Armando,
> 
> Richard is right, The LPC2104 / 2105 and 2106 do not support code 
read
> protection. Somebody with a JTAG debugger can go in an read your 
code.
> All other devices of the LPC2000-family do support code read 
protection. 
> 
> Application Support Philips
> 
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "funes_armando" <funes_armando@y...>
> wrote:
> > The only point of my post is that I want to know if the LPC2104 
has 
> > code read protection. 
> > 
> > Could someone answer this simple question?
> > 
> > Thanks all
> > 
> > Armando.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > >  
> > > I think some of us have totally missed the point. Your 
competitor 
> > is not going to sit down and try to crack your chip. He is going 
to 
> > send it to a slimy company that have already worked out how to 
see 
> > into your type of chip and they will charge a pittance for 
ripping it 
> > off.
> > >  
> > > This is a business. They charge their clients a few thousand 
> > dollars for a few minutes work. This IS a global problem and one 
that 
> > Chip manufacturers need to seriously adress.
> > >  
> > > Dont tell me how difficult it is to find a way into a chip. You 
> > only have to do it once then set up in business.
> > >  
> > > Your code is worth max 10K usd. What is it worth to your 
> > competitor. Being as it is only a few minutes work to the copy 
> > company you can probably bargain the price down too.
> > >  
> > > This is a real problem and one that will not go away through 
> > wishful thinking. 
> > >  
> > > George Powell
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Dear people, I don't want to discuss about governments, back 
doors, 
> > > etc. 
> > > We all know that exists expensive procedures to unprotect 
devices, 
> > > but they are EXPENSIVES and in most cases exceeds the 
development 
> > > expense. 
> > > If I really want to protect my intellectual property in all 
> > > circumstances, I should use a tamper proof device. But I want 
to 
> > use 
> > > the LPC2104 because of it's price and features. 
> > > 
> > > According to LPC2114 data sheet and like Pete wrote, code read 
> > > protection in LPC2114 is available since bootloader revision 
1.61 
> > > But this device is more expensive than the LPC2104. I can't 
believe 
> > > that the LPC2104 doesn't have the same feature.
> > > 
> > > Please, could somebody tell me if the LPC2104 have code read 
> > > protection?.
> > > 
> > > Thanks all
> > > 
> > > Armando
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > 
> > >    To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/
> > >   
> > >    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >   
> > >    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
> > Service. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 		
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.