Thanks for your answer. Do you know if Philips is planning to add this feature to the LPC210x?. Is it possible to disable JTAG debugger by firmware? Regards Armando --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "philips_apps" <philips_apps@y...> wrote: > Hello Armando, > > Richard is right, The LPC2104 / 2105 and 2106 do not support code read > protection. Somebody with a JTAG debugger can go in an read your code. > All other devices of the LPC2000-family do support code read protection. > > Application Support Philips > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "funes_armando" <funes_armando@y...> > wrote: > > The only point of my post is that I want to know if the LPC2104 has > > code read protection. > > > > Could someone answer this simple question? > > > > Thanks all > > > > Armando. > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I think some of us have totally missed the point. Your competitor > > is not going to sit down and try to crack your chip. He is going to > > send it to a slimy company that have already worked out how to see > > into your type of chip and they will charge a pittance for ripping it > > off. > > > > > > This is a business. They charge their clients a few thousand > > dollars for a few minutes work. This IS a global problem and one that > > Chip manufacturers need to seriously adress. > > > > > > Dont tell me how difficult it is to find a way into a chip. You > > only have to do it once then set up in business. > > > > > > Your code is worth max 10K usd. What is it worth to your > > competitor. Being as it is only a few minutes work to the copy > > company you can probably bargain the price down too. > > > > > > This is a real problem and one that will not go away through > > wishful thinking. > > > > > > George Powell > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Dear people, I don't want to discuss about governments, back doors, > > > etc. > > > We all know that exists expensive procedures to unprotect devices, > > > but they are EXPENSIVES and in most cases exceeds the development > > > expense. > > > If I really want to protect my intellectual property in all > > > circumstances, I should use a tamper proof device. But I want to > > use > > > the LPC2104 because of it's price and features. > > > > > > According to LPC2114 data sheet and like Pete wrote, code read > > > protection in LPC2114 is available since bootloader revision 1.61 > > > But this device is more expensive than the LPC2104. I can't believe > > > that the LPC2104 doesn't have the same feature. > > > > > > Please, could somebody tell me if the LPC2104 have code read > > > protection?. > > > > > > Thanks all > > > > > > Armando > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > To visit your group on the web, go to: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Flash Security
2004-09-16 by funes_armando
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.