Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: FAT file system ==>warning

2004-09-23 by embeddedjanitor

I have read parts of the thread on FAT file system, and feel some 
moral responsibility to raise a warning.

If you're using FAT as a method of storing/retrieving non-critical 
data, fine.

Sometimes you need to share data with Micriosft PCs and don't have 
much choice.

If, however, you're using FAT to store critical data (ie FAT fails, 
then system fails), be warned that FAT is terrible at this job and you 
should consider some other file system strategy.

According to http://www.datalight.com/product_detail.asp?
p_id=22&archive=0  up to 80% of product failures in devices using FAT 
can be blamed on FAT file system corruption. Of course they have 
something to sell, so one should treat their view with some suspicion. 
[Having written a log-structured file system, I disagree with most of 
the things they say about those too].
Still, I am aware of FAT causing significant problems for many 
systems.

IMHO use something other than FAT if you can.


-- Charles

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.